Testing #4

Closed
opened 2 years ago by geoffrey · 0 comments
geoffrey commented 2 years ago
Owner

Some tests would be great to reduce the risk of false positives and negatives with changes to the source lists.

We should store for every known first-party tracker and false-positive:

  • The hyperlink of the website (for experimentation in the browser)
  • A list of subdomains that should not be blocked (one should be good, but using a list for good measure)
  • A list of subdomains that should be blocked (can be empty, for false positives)
  • A comment (optional)

This can also be considered as a way to "document" the first-party trackers and keep track of their evolution.

Some tests would be great to reduce the risk of false positives and negatives with changes to the source lists. We should store for every known first-party tracker and false-positive: - The hyperlink of the website (for experimentation in the browser) - A list of subdomains that should not be blocked (one should be good, but using a list for good measure) - A list of subdomains that should be blocked (can be empty, for false positives) - A comment (optional) This can also be considered as a way to "document" the first-party trackers and keep track of their evolution.
geoffrey added the
enhancement
label 2 years ago
geoffrey closed this issue 2 years ago
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

This issue currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Loading…
There is no content yet.